Training Module

Auditing AI Risk & Impact Management

Understand how to audit harm, impact, and risk reasoning, intended use alignment, and decision documentation in an ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system

Training Module

Auditing AI Risk & Impact Management

Understand how to audit harm, impact, and risk reasoning, intended use alignment, and decision documentation in an ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system

Training Module

Auditing AI Risk & Impact Management

Understand how to audit harm, impact, and risk reasoning, intended use alignment, and decision documentation in an ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system

Manager presenting AI risk and impact decisions to auditors in a meeting setting, representing auditing of AI risk and impact management, intended use alignment, and traceable decision-making under ISO/IEC 42001.

Move from “risk paperwork” to defensible, traceable AI risk and impact decisions

AI risk and impact management is credible when it clearly connects intended use, affected stakeholders, and documented decisions to real controls and oversight. This module helps auditors test that chain and recognise where reasoning, traceability, or documentation breaks down in practice.

Manager presenting AI risk and impact decisions to auditors in a meeting setting, representing auditing of AI risk and impact management, intended use alignment, and traceable decision-making under ISO/IEC 42001.

Move from “risk paperwork” to defensible, traceable AI risk and impact decisions

AI risk and impact management is credible when it clearly connects intended use, affected stakeholders, and documented decisions to real controls and oversight. This module helps auditors test that chain and recognise where reasoning, traceability, or documentation breaks down in practice.

Manager presenting AI risk and impact decisions to auditors in a meeting setting, representing auditing of AI risk and impact management, intended use alignment, and traceable decision-making under ISO/IEC 42001.

Move from “risk paperwork” to defensible, traceable AI risk and impact decisions

AI risk and impact management is credible when it clearly connects intended use, affected stakeholders, and documented decisions to real controls and oversight. This module helps auditors test that chain and recognise where reasoning, traceability, or documentation breaks down in practice.

Training module overview

Training module overview

Training module overview

In ISO/IEC 42001 audits, weak AI risk and impact management rarely fails because an organisation “didn’t use the right framework.” It fails because the organisation cannot show a coherent line from intended use and stakeholders to impact reasoning, risk decisions, and documented acceptance of trade-offs. This creates false assurance: the system looks controlled on paper, while key harms, misuses, and operational realities remain unaddressed.

This standard-specific audit add-on focuses on how to audit the quality of reasoning and documentation behind AI risk and impact decisions, without re-teaching generic risk methods or generic audit craft. It is mandatory in the ISO/IEC 42001 auditor pathway and is applicable to internal auditors and third-party auditors (including certification-body and independent assurance contexts).

In ISO/IEC 42001 audits, weak AI risk and impact management rarely fails because an organisation “didn’t use the right framework.” It fails because the organisation cannot show a coherent line from intended use and stakeholders to impact reasoning, risk decisions, and documented acceptance of trade-offs. This creates false assurance: the system looks controlled on paper, while key harms, misuses, and operational realities remain unaddressed.

This standard-specific audit add-on focuses on how to audit the quality of reasoning and documentation behind AI risk and impact decisions, without re-teaching generic risk methods or generic audit craft. It is mandatory in the ISO/IEC 42001 auditor pathway and is applicable to internal auditors and third-party auditors (including certification-body and independent assurance contexts).

Applicable environments

This module focuses on auditing clauses and controls that are specific to ISO/IEC 42001. It is intended for auditors working with organisations operating an AI management system (AIMS) according to this standard.

Target audience

Target audience

Target audience

  • Aspiring auditors who want to audit AI management systems against ISO/IEC 42001 following best practices

  • Practising ISO/IEC 42001 auditors who want to strengthen their audit knowledge, judgement, and effectiveness

  • Aspiring auditors who want to audit AI management systems against ISO/IEC 42001 following best practices

  • Practising ISO/IEC 42001 auditors who want to strengthen their audit knowledge, judgement, and effectiveness

Decision support

Is this module for you?

It is a good fit if you…

  • seek to audit the quality of AI risk and impact reasoning.

  • are aiming to judge alignment between intended use, impacts, and decisions.

  • focus on traceability from risk reasoning to documented controls.

  • are prepared to test whether decisions hold up under real use conditions.

  • expect to strengthen audit conclusions on AI risk governance.

  • seek to audit the quality of AI risk and impact reasoning.

  • are aiming to judge alignment between intended use, impacts, and decisions.

  • focus on traceability from risk reasoning to documented controls.

  • are prepared to test whether decisions hold up under real use conditions.

  • expect to strengthen audit conclusions on AI risk governance.

If most of the points above apply, this module is likely a good fit.

It may not be the best fit if you…

  • prefer to design AI risk frameworks or impact assessment methods.

  • are looking for guidance on harm analysis or ethical risk modelling.

  • focus primarily on managing or mitigating AI risks yourself.

  • do not intend to audit AI risk and impact management under ISO/IEC 42001.

  • prefer to design AI risk frameworks or impact assessment methods.

  • are looking for guidance on harm analysis or ethical risk modelling.

  • focus primarily on managing or mitigating AI risks yourself.

  • do not intend to audit AI risk and impact management under ISO/IEC 42001.

Agenda

Agenda

Agenda

  • What “AI risk & impact management” means in an ISO/IEC 42001 audit

  • Testing harm and impact reasoning

  • Intended use integrity and stakeholder alignment

  • Decision documentation quality

  • Evidence trails, sampling focus, and red-flag patterns

  • Case-based audit simulation

Show detailed agenda...

  • What “AI risk & impact management” means in an ISO/IEC 42001 audit

  • Testing harm and impact reasoning

  • Intended use integrity and stakeholder alignment

  • Decision documentation quality

  • Evidence trails, sampling focus, and red-flag patterns

  • Case-based audit simulation

Show detailed agenda...

  • What “AI risk & impact management” means in an ISO/IEC 42001 audit

  • Testing harm and impact reasoning

  • Intended use integrity and stakeholder alignment

  • Decision documentation quality

  • Evidence trails, sampling focus, and red-flag patterns

  • Case-based audit simulation

Show detailed agenda...

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Key outcomes

  • Evaluate whether harm/impact reasoning is specific, complete enough for decisions, and consistent across artefacts

  • Test traceability from intended use and stakeholder considerations to impact assessment, risk decisions, and controls

  • Assess whether risk and impact decisions are documented in a way that supports accountability and later review


  • Evaluate whether harm/impact reasoning is specific, complete enough for decisions, and consistent across artefacts

  • Test traceability from intended use and stakeholder considerations to impact assessment, risk decisions, and controls

  • Assess whether risk and impact decisions are documented in a way that supports accountability and later review


Additional capabilities

  • Identify and prioritise evidence sources that demonstrate real operation (not just planned intent)

  • Recognise common ISO/IEC 42001 risk/impact audit red flags that indicate false assurance

  • Define focused audit tests for decision quality without substituting for generic audit planning or interviewing techniques


  • Identify and prioritise evidence sources that demonstrate real operation (not just planned intent)

  • Recognise common ISO/IEC 42001 risk/impact audit red flags that indicate false assurance

  • Define focused audit tests for decision quality without substituting for generic audit planning or interviewing techniques


Additional benefits

Additional benefits

Additional benefits

Learning materials

  • Slide deck

  • Participant workbook

Templates & tools

Practical, reusable artefacts to apply the module directly to your organisation.

  • Intended use integrity checklist (intended vs actual use; drift and misuse prompts)

  • Stakeholder alignment evidence map (expectations/obligations → where to verify)

  • Decision documentation review checklist (rationale, trade-offs, approvals, residual acceptance)

  • Traceability test worksheet (use case → impact → risk decision → control/monitoring evidence)

  • Red-flag library for AI risk/impact management audits (typical patterns and what to test next)

  • Intended use integrity checklist (intended vs actual use; drift and misuse prompts)

  • Stakeholder alignment evidence map (expectations/obligations → where to verify)

  • Decision documentation review checklist (rationale, trade-offs, approvals, residual acceptance)

  • Traceability test worksheet (use case → impact → risk decision → control/monitoring evidence)

  • Red-flag library for AI risk/impact management audits (typical patterns and what to test next)

Confirmation

  • Certificate of completion

Module ID

HAM-AI-A-01

Audience

Auditor

Language

English

Delivery

Live virtual

Duration

3 h

List price

CHF 250

Excl. VAT. VAT may apply depending on customer location and status.

Delivery & learning format

Delivery & learning format

Delivery & learning format

Virtual live teaching

This module is delivered live, with a strong focus on discussion, practical application, and direct interaction with the instructor.

Sessions work through realistic examples, clarify concepts in context, and apply methods directly to participants’ organisational realities.

Custom delivery options

For organisations with specific constraints or learning objectives, the module can be adapted in format or scope, including in-house delivery and contextualised case material.

Not sure if this module is right for you?

Not sure if this module is right for you?

Not sure if this module is right for you?

Send a short message and describe your context.

For an optimal learning experience

Preparation guidance

This module is designed as part of a modular training approach. Topics are deliberately distributed across modules and are not repeated in full, in order to avoid unnecessary redundancy. Each module is self-contained and can be taken on its own. Where prior knowledge or experience is helpful, this is indicated below so you can decide whether any preparation is useful for you.

For an optimal learning experience

Preparation guidance

This module is designed as part of a modular training approach. Topics are deliberately distributed across modules and are not repeated in full, in order to avoid unnecessary redundancy. Each module is self-contained and can be taken on its own. Where prior knowledge or experience is helpful, this is indicated below so you can decide whether any preparation is useful for you.

For an optimal learning experience

Preparation guidance

This module is designed as part of a modular training approach. Topics are deliberately distributed across modules and are not repeated in full, in order to avoid unnecessary redundancy. Each module is self-contained and can be taken on its own. Where prior knowledge or experience is helpful, this is indicated below so you can decide whether any preparation is useful for you.

Assumed background

This module assumes auditors can already apply core audit evidence and judgement concepts and are familiar with management system basics. It does not teach generic audit craft or generic risk methodology.

Helpful background includes:

  • Practical ability to evaluate evidence, sampling rationale, and professional judgement

  • General understanding of how management systems use documented information to support governance decisions

This module assumes auditors can already apply core audit evidence and judgement concepts and are familiar with management system basics. It does not teach generic audit craft or generic risk methodology.

Helpful background includes:

  • Practical ability to evaluate evidence, sampling rationale, and professional judgement

  • General understanding of how management systems use documented information to support governance decisions

Preparatory modules

Foundational modules (depending on background)

Useful if you are new to the underlying concepts or want a shared baseline before attending this module.

Audit Foundations

Understand core audit mindset, evidence logic, materiality-based focus, and audit test plan design

7 h

Audit Foundations

Understand core audit mindset, evidence logic, materiality-based focus, and audit test plan design

7 h

Audit Foundations

Understand core audit mindset, evidence logic, materiality-based focus, and audit test plan design

7 h

AI Fundamentals II

Understand AI uncertainty, limitations, and common failure modes across predictive and generative AI systems

7 h

AI Fundamentals II

Understand AI uncertainty, limitations, and common failure modes across predictive and generative AI systems

7 h

AI Fundamentals II

Understand AI uncertainty, limitations, and common failure modes across predictive and generative AI systems

7 h

AI Risk, Impact & Harm Assessment

Understand how to assess AI impacts and harms, document results, and connect them to risk decisions in an AI management system

7 h

AI Risk, Impact & Harm Assessment

Understand how to assess AI impacts and harms, document results, and connect them to risk decisions in an AI management system

7 h

AI Risk, Impact & Harm Assessment

Understand how to assess AI impacts and harms, document results, and connect them to risk decisions in an AI management system

7 h

Supporting modules (optional)

Helpful if you want to deepen related skills, but not required to participate effectively.

AI Fundamentals I

Learn core AI concepts, AI system types, and the technical building blocks that underpin modern AI-enabled products and services

7 h

AI Fundamentals I

Learn core AI concepts, AI system types, and the technical building blocks that underpin modern AI-enabled products and services

7 h

AI Fundamentals I

Learn core AI concepts, AI system types, and the technical building blocks that underpin modern AI-enabled products and services

7 h

Audit Execution: Communication & Interviewing

Learn the skills for effective interview planning, questioning, and conversation control for reliable audit evidence

7 h

Audit Execution: Communication & Interviewing

Learn the skills for effective interview planning, questioning, and conversation control for reliable audit evidence

7 h

Audit Execution: Communication & Interviewing

Learn the skills for effective interview planning, questioning, and conversation control for reliable audit evidence

7 h

Audit Reporting & Follow-up

Understand how to write evidence-based findings, structure audit reports, and follow up agreed actions to verified closure

7 h

Audit Reporting & Follow-up

Understand how to write evidence-based findings, structure audit reports, and follow up agreed actions to verified closure

7 h

Audit Reporting & Follow-up

Understand how to write evidence-based findings, structure audit reports, and follow up agreed actions to verified closure

7 h

Office scene with people standing, walking and sitting

Ready to improve your management systems?

We support continuous improvement by embedding ISO requirements into everyday practice and daily operations.

Office scene with people standing, walking and sitting

Ready to improve your management systems?

We support continuous improvement by embedding ISO requirements into everyday practice and daily operations.

Office scene with people standing, walking and sitting

Ready to improve your management systems?

We support continuous improvement by embedding ISO requirements into everyday practice and daily operations.